Buy and Sell Products on Ebay

Kidnapped Hacker Found in Turkey, Arrested

posted by admin in Uncategorized

Mert_ortac
A Turkish computer hacker and informant who’d been allegedly kidnapped and tortured by a notorious ATM swindler was arrested this week,  according to a report from the Turkish press.

Turkish police arrested Mert Ortac on computer hacking charges on Tuesday, reports Haber 7. Ortac, known under the hacker handle Kier, is an associate of another Turkish hacker called Cha0, who allegedly abducted him earlier this year.

Ortac had been leaking information about Cha0 to Turkish reporters and police when he briefly disappeared last spring. He resurfaced in May, and described being kidnapped and beaten by Cha0 and his henchmen. A photo of Kier stripped down to his underwear and seated in a chair then appeared on the online crime forum DarkMarket, where Cha0 served as an administrator. In the image, Ortac is seen holding a sign that reads in part: "I am rat. I am pig. I am reporter. I am fucked by Cha0."

Cha0, identified as one Cagatay Evyapan, was arrested in September, shortly before DarkMarket was revealed as an FBI sting run out of an office  in Pittsburgh.

Cha0 had specialized in selling a high-quality ATM skimmer and keypad that fraudsters can covertly affix to certain models of cash machines to collect magstripe data and PINs from unsuspecting customers. According to Haber 7, Ortac is accused of participating in the cash machine scheme.

See Also:


Original post by Kevin Poulsen

Experimental Shoe-Print Database Sees the Soles of Criminals

posted by admin in 2735

Sriharishoeprints

The clothes may make the man, but if a University at Buffalo professor has his way, the shoes will nab the criminal.

Dr. Sargur Srihari, a computer science professor, is building a search engine populated with thousands of shoe images scraped from internet shoe stores that would let police forensics units submit a photo of a shoe print from a crime scene and quickly learn the gender, size and brand of shoe a killer or thief was likely wearing.

Shoe prints are some of the most common evidence left at crime scenes, but there’s a limited number of shoe identification experts and the tech tools available to them aren’t nearly as good as one might think from watching  cops shows and movies. Complicating matters, shoe treads wear down and wear out, and small pebbles
lodge in a shoe’s ridges, distorting their prints. That’s where
computational forensics comes in.

"CSI makes it looks like it is all solved," Srihari said. "But actually, it is a very hard problem. Shoe prints can even harder than fingerprints to match."

Patternimage_srihari

Srihari and his grad students started by scraping online shoe stores like Zappos for images of the bottoms of shoes. Then they analyzed the images to identify patterns and built a shoe tread database of more than 10,000 pairs of men’s shoes, ranging from Timberland boots to Nike indoor soccer shoes.

Srihari was surprised to find that many online web sellers include pictures of soles of shoes.

"It just amazes me there are so many unique patterns," Srihari said. "People like individualistic shoes and I guess the look of the sole matters to people."

Then to simulate crime scene evidence, they had students step in powder and walk on a carpet to create a "positive" images and step onto a dusty surface to capture "negative" images.

Now, he’s working on algorithms that will identify likely matches for his images and for partial foot prints. Working from the suggested results, a forensic shoe print examiner can find the most likely match, which can then be used to build a criminal case.

Shoeprintslefttoright

Srihari’s approach won $300,000 in grant money this year from the
Justice Department’s National Institute of Justice, which funds
research into new technology and approaches to law enforcement. Currently shoe print examiners rely on deep human knowledge, intuition, and an online system for asking for help from the small handful of people who know a shoe by its print.

"Shoe print forensics is not such a glamorous field," Srihari said. "What we do is take the areas where human intuition comes in and try to use computational tools."

As an example of the power of such techniques, he points to work he did with the U.S. Postal Service in the 1990s when nearly all hand-addressed envelopes were hand-routed. But pattern matching technology largely solved that problem — now, 95 percent of hand-addressed mail is read only by computers, according to Srihari.

Srihari doesn’t expect that kind of success any time soon for the shoe project, which he describes as one of the toughest he’s tackled, mostly due to the wear and tear that shoes endure.

Still Srihari says any would-be criminals would be smart to avoid sneakers.

"Go in a suit if you commit a crime — there are no prints on dress shoes," Srihari said.

Images courtesy University at Buffalo

See Also:


Original post by Ryan Singel

Dead Teen’s Mother Testifies about Daughter’s Vulnerability in MySpace Suicide Case — Update

posted by admin in 2739

Myspace_case

LOS ANGELES — Two months before she committed suicide in 2006, a 13-year-old girl at the center of a landmark cyberbullying case was the happiest her parents had seen her in a long time.

Tina Meier, testifying in a U.S. District Court in Los Angeles on Wednesday afternoon, described to jurors how her daughter Megan was diagnosed with attention-deficit disorder and depression in the third grade and had spent years taking prescription medication and battling low self-esteem exacerbated by bullying schoolmates.

Megan’s spirits lifted when she switched schools in August 2006, her mother said. The teen’s outlook improved even more a month later when a "hot" 16-year-old boy named "Josh Evans" contacted her out of the blue through her MySpace page and told her he wanted to become her friend.

Less than a month later, "Josh" turned on Megan. He joined others taunting her with cruel and venomous comments. After he sent her a message saying, "the world would be a better place without you," Megan responded, "You are the kind of boy a girl would kill herself over." Thirty minutes later, she hanged herself in her bedroom closet with a belt.

The defendant in the case, 49-year-old Lori Drew, is charged with
violating MySpace’s terms of service by conspiring with her daughter and an assistant
to set up the hoax "Josh Evans" account and torment Megan. Ashley Grills, a then-18-year-old
woman employed by Drew and her husband, has admitted sending the
final message to Megan while posing as Evans. Grills has been granted immunity from prosecution in exchange for
her cooperation with the government, and is scheduled to testify
against Drew.

As Meier described her daughter’s end, several family members sitting in the courtroom’s front row — including her ex-husband Ron Meier, and aunt Vicki Dunn — sobbed and dabbed their eyes with Kleenex. Two of the male jurors brought their hands to their chins, listening intently, but there was little to indicate how the jury of six men and six women absorbed the testimony.

Defense attorney H. Dean Steward called Meier’s testimony "totally improper in a computer fraud case."

Meier took the stand Wednesday following opening statements, and
testimony by another witness. Susan Prouty, a 34-year-old former
business client of Lori Drew, said Drew confessed to her that she had
created the MySpace profile used to harass Megan. According to Prouty,
Drew also admitted writing some of the messages "Josh" sent to the girl.

Defense lawyer Steward maintains that Drew did not use or create the
MySpace account, and on cross examination, he challenged Prouty’s
testimony, zeroing in on the notion that Drew would have shared so much
information with a purely-professional associate. He asked if Prouty
might have confused what she’d heard from other people, or in media
reports, with what Drew told her. Prouty said she had not confused the
two.

Then Meier took the stand. Asked to describe her late daughter, Meier
called Megan "bubbly" and "energetic" with a "huge sense of humor."

But Megan had also had problems. She took prescription medication for
ADD and depression, and saw a psychologist on a regular basis, right up
until her death. Megan also suffered from self-esteem and body-image
issues, believing herself to be fat in comparison to other girl. In
2005, Megan scratched "small marks" onto her wrist, Meier testified.

The medication and counseling didn’t entirely address problems that
Megan was having in the world. Her mother testified that she was
taunted and bullied at school and that she stopped eating lunch because
boys at school would stand behind her and call her fat.

When prosecutor Thomas O’Brien asked if Megan liked boys, Meier smiled
for the first time on the stand and said she "definitely liked boys,"
and had pictures of them on her walls.

She described how Megan and Sarah Drew — Lori Drew’s daughter — became friends in the fourth
grade; the two families lived only four doors apart. Megan joined the
Drews on at least three family outings and vacations to visit their
relatives. But as they got older, their relationship ran hot-and-cold
in a manner typical for teenage girls.

Significantly, Meier said that Drew was aware of Megan’s mental health
issues, because they discussed them a number of times. Furthermore,
when Megan accompanied the Drew family on outings, Lori Drew was
responsible for ensuring that Megan took her medication.

In eighth grade, the Meiers decided to remove Megan from her public
school and send her to a private Catholic school instead. Drew was "not
happy" about the move, Meier said. But after the change, Megan’s grades
improved, as well as her attitude, and she was allowed to
open a MySpace account to stay in contact with friends — though under strict restrictions.

It had to be a private account, so no one could view Megan’s profile
unless they were approved by Megan and her parents. Only her parents
held the password, and Megan was allowed to use the account only when one of
them was in the room. Megan’s parents also had monitoring software
installed to track web sites Megan visited, and instant messages she
exchanged with people.

On September 20, 2006, not long after she signed up, Megan got the
friend request from "Josh Evans". Meier asked her daughter if she knew
him. Megan said she didn’t, but thought he might be a
friend-of-a-friend, and Meier gave her permission to add him to her
friends list.

Megan was instantly smitten. Evans told her she was cute. Coming from
an attractive and mysterious boy, the praise was catnip to
a young girl suffering from self-esteem issues.

Meier later became suspicious of "Josh" because as their correspondence
progressed, he made excuses about why he couldn’t meet up with her or
call her, and at one point appeared to make a sexually suggestive
remark. Fearing he might be an adult, Meier contacted the St. Charles
County sheriff department’s cyberdivision about investigating the
issue, but was rebuffed.

Then on October 15, Josh sent Megan a message saying that he didn’t
want to be friends anymore. The next day, Josh told her he’d heard she
wasn’t nice to her friends, and that’s why he wanted to sever their
ties.

Megan became upset and Meier, who had to leave the house to take her
other daughter to an orthodontist appointment, told Megan to shut down
the computer. Megan didn’t do as she was told, however, and got
embroiled in an electronic brawl when at least two other people began
attacking her online, culminating in the final message from "Josh".

When Meier came home she found Megan still online and in tears. When
she appealed to her mother for support, Meier chastised her for being
on the computer when she’d been instructed to shut it down, and suggested that Megan had brought some of the attacks on herself by continuing to
communicate with her attackers.

Megan, in mental anguish at this point, told her mother, "You’re supposed to be my Mom. You’re supposed to be on my side."

Thirty minutes later, Megan hanged herself, Meier testified.

At this point in Meier’s testimony, Judge Wu called for the
proceedings to break for the day. After jurors were escorted from the
courtroom, Steward asked for a mistrial. Wu denied the request, and
told Steward that if he’d found Meier’s testimony objectionable, then
he could have objected to it at the time. "I would have sustained
[those objections]," he said.

The trial resumes Thursday, when Meier is scheduled to be cross-examined.

Update: On cross examination Thursday morning, Drew’s lawyer asked Meier about a trio of medications Megan had been taking at the time of her death. One of them, the antidepressant citalopram, has a reported side affect of contributing to suicidal behavior in children and adolescents suffering from depression, he noted.

Defense attorney H. Dean Steward went on to grill Meier about a different MySpace incident he says occurred in December 2005, six months before the Meiers began closely controlling Megan’s internet use. At that time, Megan created a MySpace profile as an 18-year-old woman, and swapped sexually-charged banter with other users, he said, citing notes he’d obtained from Megan’s psychologist.

“Don’t you remember her portraying herself as an 18-year old, ten months earlier?,’ Steward asked.

“Obviously, I don’t,” said Meier.

Steward’s point: by lying about her age, Megan herself had committed the same terms-of-service violation that Drew is now facing felony prosecution over. He introduced this theme earlier in his cross examination, asking Meier if she’d read MySpace’s contract before allowing Megan to establish the MySpace profile through which she befriended “Josh.” MySpace doesn’t allow users under the age of 14.

Meier answered that she had read every word, even though it took some 25 minutes. She once worked for a law firm, she said, and had learned to read any contract carefully before agreeing to it. In this case, Meier saw no harm in letting Megan sign up while only 13, because she’d be turning 14 in about a month-and-a-half.

Also in December 2005, Steward said, Megan had been complaining to Sarah that her parents were fighting, and it was depressing her. She hinted at suicide in some of those conversations, according to Steward, who read from an e-mail Megan allegedly sent to Sarah. "I think I’m going to do suicide tonight. I can’t take it any more."

Meier said she never saw such an e-mail.

See Also:


Original post by Kim Zetter

Linux Guru Reiser Seeks New Murder Trial

posted by admin in Uncategorized

Eyeswideopen

Defense attorney William DuBois and Hans Reiser confer during Reiser’s murder trial.

Sketch: Norman Quebedeau
.

Hans Reiser wants a trial do-over.

Reiser is the Linux guru who in April was
convictedof the first-degree murder of his estranged wife. He’s the same defendant who, in exchange for a 15-to-life term instead of a 25-to-life term,
broughtauthorities to the Oakland hills where he buried
Nina Reiser’s body.

He even
apologizedfor killing her.

But in a handwritten appellate motion, he is appealing his conviction. Yet there’s a glaring problem with this appeal, in which he claims he thought the deal would have only sent him away for three years, not 15-to-life.

When he took the 15-to-life deal in August, he waived his right to appeal. And when entering the deal, he said he understood what he was doing and was represented by effective counsel. The appeal was first reported by the

San Francisco Chronicle.

Perhaps Reiser is a little peeved that he
turned down a pretrial deal last year with Alameda County Superior Court Judge Larry Goodman, in which the developer of the ReiserFS file system was offered three years if he pleaded guilty and disclosed where he hid 31-year-old Nina Reiser’s body.

But the boyhood genius thought he could outsmart the jury, which grew tired of his hours on the witness stand attempting to explain away a myriad of coincidences linking him to his wife’s murder -– days of testimony his attorney said was against his advice.

Now the 44-year-old Reiser says he thinks the latest deal was supposed to have netted three years. And he said his lead attorney, William DuBois, who he often
butted headswith during trial, was out to get him.

Reiser
wrote(.pdf) that he believed DuBois suffered from an excess of
oxytocin.

“Persons with oxytocin excess enjoy betraying others,” Reiser wrote.

Reiser added, “I believe that the attraction of duping and betraying me exceeded the attraction of duping and betraying a jury, due to my unique personal characteristics.”

Reiser demands that DuBois’ oxytocin levels be tested, and that if they are high, the courts should determine that Reiser was a victim of ineffective assistance of counsel and be granted a new trial.

DuBois was not immediately available for comment. Trial judge Larry Goodman
denied(.pdf) Reiser’s handwritten motion, which wasn’t even made to a California appellate court.

Reiser called his lawyer delusional and claimed he picked jurors based on Chinese astrology. “It is a logical necessity that either I am delusional, or he is delusional.”

Threat Level covered the trial gavel to gavel for six months and
knows the answerto that question.

The convict is also demanding a polygraph test “to prove my counsel colluded with agents of the State of California to perpetuate numerous other frauds relating to the case.”

Here’s a short synopsis of Reiser’s courtroom defense, the
so-called
geek defense.”

*He told jurors his
31-year-old wife, whom he met in Russia,
fled the United Statesand abandoned the divorcing couple’s two young children after he accused her of bilking his Namesys software company. Her blood was found in her house, where she was last seen, because she either cut her finger cooking or had a
bloody nose, he testified.

*The passenger seat of his car went missing because he threw it away. That tiny Honda CRX was filled with water when the authorities discovered it weeks after Nina went missing Sept. 3, 2006 because it was dirty and needing a good washing.

He was a computer geek, a “scientist,”
he told jurors, and his guilt-ridden behavior in the aftermath of his wife’s disappearance was a result of staring a computer for too long.

Jurors, and even the
judge, did a horrible job concealing their amusement when Reiser was on the stand. The often shook their heads in disbelief or openly mocked his ongoing testimony.

See Also:


Original post by David Kravets

Prosecutor: Lori Drew Intended to ‘Prey’ on Girl’s Psyche

posted by admin in 2727

Lori_drew_9_4_08_2

LOS ANGELES — The woman accused of making unauthorized use of MySpace to  inflict emotional harm on a 13-year-old girl, who then committed suicide, "fully intended to hurt and prey on Megan Meier’s psyche," a prosecutor charged Wednesday, as opening statements began in the first federal cyber-bullying trial.

After some initial problems finding unbiased jurors, a jury of six men and six women was finally impanelled in the trial Wednesday afternoon. Prosecutor Thomas O’Brien immediately launched into his opening argument, in which he previewed the case he plans to present in the days ahead.

Defendant Lori Drew, a 49-year-old Missouri woman, watched O’Brien’s opening salvo wide-eyed from the defense table, until O’Brien reached the details of Meier’s suicide and its aftermath. Then Drew began scribbling intently on a notepad, averting her eyes from the prosecutor and jury.

O’Brien claimed that Drew actively conspired with two others in creating and maintaining a MySpace profile for a nonexistent 16-year-old boy named "Josh Evans" in September 2006. The Evans account was used by multiple people to flirt with, befriend and ultimately reject 13-year-old Megan Meier, who’d had a falling-out with Drew’s daughter.

One of the users of the account, Ashley Grills, a then-18-year-old woman employed by Drew and her husband, has admitted to sending a final, cruel message to Meier while posing as Evans: "The world would be a better place without you. Have a shitty rest of your life." Meier then hanged herself in her bedroom.

Grills has been granted immunity from prosecution in exchange for her cooperation with the government, and is scheduled to testify against Drew.

Though the prosecution concedes that Drew did not send that final message, O’Brien argued that the whole purpose of the hoax from the start was to inflict emotional distress on a vulnerable young girl.

O’Brien said he’d offer testimony that Drew conspired with her daughter, Sarah, and with Grills to humiliate Meier, and was heard laughing about the hoax they were perpetrating on the girl.

Drew discussed using Meier’s personal notes to "Evans" to humiliate her at school, and  conspired at one point to lure the girl to a nearby mall to meet Evans, whereupon Meier would similarly be confronted with the messages she’d sent the nonexistent boy, said O’Brien.

After Meier’s death, Drew’s hairdresser allegedly asked Drew why she was going to the wake, given her role in the cyber bullying. Drew’s response, O’Brien said, was, "It’s not like I pulled the trigger."

At that point in the opening argument, one of the jury alternates, an elderly woman, visibly cringed.

Defense attorney H. Dean Steward, delivering his opening remarks, painted a very different picture. He claimed that Drew knew about the plan to create the hoax MySpace profile and manipulate Meier, but neither encouraged nor participated in it.

Steward told the jury that forensics evidence will prove the account was not created from Drew’s computer, and that no messages were sent by Drew.

Top image: Sept. 4, 2008 file photo shows Lori Drew leaving court in Los Angeles. Nick Ut/AP

See Also:


Original post by Kim Zetter

The Threat Level Rewards Program

posted by admin in Uncategorized

These are tough times for web journalism, which is why we admire the innovative "webathon" approach announced today by the National Review Online. Explains NRO editor Kathryn Jean Lopez: "Donations of $1,000 or more include new opportunities for access to our editors and writers."

I’m here to announce that at Threat Level, we’re going much cheaper. Here’s the skinny on our new sponsorship drive, broken down by your level of support.

L O W ($5 - $9)
You get to skip that annoying CAPTCHA on our commenting system. Our motto: If your money’s green, you pass Turing
G U A R D E D ($10 - $19)
The next time we publish a leaked or FOIAed secret document, we’ll insert your name in place of all the redactions
E L E V A T E D ($20 -$29)
Sorry you didn’t get to testify at the Jammie Thomas trial? One of our courtroom sketch artists will insert you into the action at the pending retrial. Be a part of legal history for pennies a day!
H I G H ($30 - $49)
Enjoy exclusive, elite access to Threat Level writers and editors by getting our real e-mail addresses, instead of the fake ones we post on this page
S E V E R E ($50+)
Lunch with a Threat Leveler of your choice! (You’re buying)

 

Stay tuned for payment details.


Original post by Kevin Poulsen

U.S. Drug Czar Posts Roadmap to Buying Dope in San Francisco

posted by admin in 2711


Potstarbucks

Vacationers traveling to San Francisco and hoping to score some weed have a great new resource at their disposal, courtesy of the U.S. government: a Google map mashup that shows the locations of all the medical marijuana dispensaries in the City by the Bay.

The map, posted on the blog of the
Office of National Drug Control Policy, denotes the locations of 71 pot sellers with tiny cannabis leaf icons. The map also pinpoints all the Starbucks stores — just the thing for smokers looking to satisfy their munchies with a overpriced croissant.

Apparently, the ONDCP is trying to make a point about the prevalence of marijuana dispensaries in California, where pot possession and use is legal, under state law, with a doctor’s prescription. Some
errorshave been found in the map (the first version included 27 additional addresses that didn’t sell pot after all; Oops!) but it’s still the best use of your tax dollars since the same office was
caught producingfake broadcast news reports in 2005.

Coming next week, Health and Human Services reveals the best spots to pick up a hooker in Las Vegas.


Original post by Kevin Poulsen

Court Halts Sale of DIY Spyware

posted by admin in 2715

Remotespy_2

A federal judge shut down the websites of a company selling do-it-yourself spyware known as RemoteSpy, following a complaint filed by federal regulators accusing the company of violating federal fair trade law, the Federal Trade Commission announced Wednesday.

The temporary restraining order and lawsuit (.pdf) mark the first time the FTC has targeted the amateur spyware market, where stalkers, jealous spouses and ethically challenged private investigators can buy keylogging software that secretly monitors people’s every online move.

RemoteSpy runs as a hidden Windows program on the target’s computer, recording password, website visits and screenshots and secretly uploading them to RemoteSpy.com, where the purchaser can log-in to see the results. The company described the product as “perfect for those who wish to monitor their computer while they are away,” but also touted that it can be remotely installed, according to a cached copy of the CyberSpy Software’s website.

The Federal Trade Commission alleges that the company provided instructions on how to fool people into installing the spyware by adding it as an innocuous-loking email attachment, including embedding it in a Word document. The complaint asks a Florida federal district court judge to stop CyberSpy and its CEO Tracer Spence from selling the software, saying it is “likely to cause substantial injury to consumers that cannot be reasonably avoided and is not outweighed by countervailing benefits to consumers or corporations.”

Much will likely turn on how much the company marketed its product for uses by stalkers, corporate criminals and jealous spouses, where the victim wouldn’t know they were being monitored. In comparison, businesses are largely free to monitor their employees’ web surfing and email usage.

The FTC took action after the Electronic Privacy Information Center filed a complaint (.pdf) about the company in March. That complaint also mentioned other companies that sell similar products, but it’s not known if the FTC is also planning enforcement actions against Spy-guide.net, Covert-Spy.com, RemotePCSpy.com and Awareness Technologies.

Attempts to reach CyberSpy CEO Tracer Spence were not immediately successful.

See Also:


Original post by Ryan Singel

Judge Reveals Long Witness List in Lori Drew Trial

posted by admin in 2719

Lori_drew_1118
LOS ANGELES — More than a dozen witnesses are scheduled to testify in the trial of a woman accused of making unauthorized use of MySpace to cause emotional distress to a 13-year-old girl, who then committed suicide.

Prosecution witnesses in the trial of 49-year-old Lori Drew of O’Fallon, Missouri, include:

  • Ron and Tina Meier, Drew’s former neighbors and the parents of Megan Meier, who committed suicide
  • Jessica Mulford, believed to be a neighborhood teen who sent one of the messages to Meier through the MySpace account
  • Michele Mulford, Jessica’s mother, who told authorities that Drew called her daughter after learning of Megan Meier’s suicide and told her to "keep her mouth shut" about their activity and to stay off of MySpace.

The list, which Judge Wu read to prospective jurors Tuesday, includes more than half a dozen other witnesses. Presumed to be among them are Drew’s hairdresser, to whom she reportedly discussed the hoax as it was occurring, and a deputy sheriff who spoke with Drew after Meier’s suicide. The latter is expected to testify that Drew admitted to starting the MySpace account, among other things.

It may be Thursday before the first witnesses are called. The trial is expected to last five days, but has already experienced at least a half a day of delay after questionnaires filled out by prospective jurors  Tuesday revealed strong biases against the defendant.

In response, U.S. District Judge George Wu gave the defense an
additional hour to review the juror responses and called in
a second pool of 30 more prospective jurors to fill out the questionnaire, adding to the initial 75.

Wu ruled last week that the jury could hear evidence of Meier’s
suicide in considering Drew’s guilt or innocence, saying it was
unlikely that jurors would not have already heard about the case, which
made national headlines late last year.

But as the judge questioned the jury pool Tuesday, it became clear
that some of them weren’t familiar with the case prior to stepping into
the Los Angeles federal courtroom this week. When asked to describe
what they’d heard about the case, their responses indicated only
information that had been read to them from the indictment that morning.

Others, however, showed strong biases in answering the written
questionnaire, which included this question: "You will hear evidence
in the case about the suicide of a 13-year-old girl. Can you put aside
any sympathy, pity or sadness you may feel as a result of this
evidence, and fairly and objectively evaluate it, along with the other
evidence in this case?"

Several of the jurors admitted on the form that they could not put
aside feelings of sympathy and indicated they might have a strong bias
against the defendant. But when Judge Wu asked them to elaborate, they
reversed themselves and said they felt they could be impartial.

Judge Wu’s questioning of the jury pool highlighted the challenge of
finding a neutral jury in a case that touches so many emotional and
cultural nerves.

One woman indicated a bias based on personal history. Her daughter’s
best friend had committed suicide and her husband’s nephew was accused
of harassing someone through MySpace. She said, however, that she
thought she could approach Drew’s case objectively.

Another woman told Wu, "I heard so many bad things about the internet
and MySpace … I see in the news all the time how dangerous it is."

A young male prospective juror said a female friend had been the victim
of cyberbullying in high school. He also said he worked with youth
groups through his church and had strong feelings about how people use
the internet maliciously, and about people who abuse children. His
answers seemed to betray a desire to stay off the jury. But then he, too,
said he felt he could be impartial.

Wu repeatedly reminded the jurors throughout Tuesday that Drew was
not being charged with causing Meier’s suicide but with violating the
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act by breaking MySpace’s terms of service.

Drew is accused of conspiring with two others in creating and
maintaining a MySpace profile for a nonexistent 16-year-old boy named
"Josh Evans" in the summer of 2006. The Evans account was used to flirt
with and befriend 13-year-old Megan Meier, who’d had a falling-out with
Drew’s daughter. "Evans" ultimately turned on Meier, and told the girl
that the world would be a better place without her. Meier then hanged
herself in her bedroom. Drew is charged with computer hacking for
allegedly violating MySpace’s terms of service with the intent of
inflicting emotional distress.

The case against Drew hinges on a novel interpretation of the federal
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. MySpace’s user agreement requires
registrants, among other things, to provide factual information about
themselves; to refrain from soliciting personal information from
minors; and forbids members from using information obtained from
MySpace services to harass or harm other people. By allegedly violating
that click-to-agree contract, Drew committed the same crime as any
hacker, prosecutors maintain.

To make that charge stick, prosecutors must convince jurors that Drew’s alleged terms-of-service violation was done primarily for the purpose of inflicting harm. In this case, the
prosecutors say the tortious act was Drew’s alleged intentional infliction of
emotional distress, which makes Megan Meier’s suicide relevant in
reaching a verdict, they argue.

The use of the anti-hacking law to charge Drew was criticized by
experts, who said it set a dangerous precedent that could potentially
make a felon out of anyone who violated the terms of service of any
website — a prospect that is particularly troubling, they said, because
terms-of-service agreements sometimes contain onerous provisions, are
often arbitrarily and unilaterally changed by companies, and are rarely
read by users.

The trial is expected to hinge on whether Drew was aware that she was
breaking the MySpace terms of service in setting up the fake account,
and whether Drew intended to cause emotional distress to Meier.

Image: Lori Drew walks to federal court in Los Angeles on Tuesday. Ric Francis/AP

See Also:


Original post by Kim Zetter

Live 11 a.m. PST Wednesday Video Chat With Threat Level’s Kravets

posted by admin in Uncategorized


Picture_15_2

Return to this post at 11 a.m. PST on Wednesday for a live video chat in which I will discuss and answer readers’ questions about the Recording Industry Association of America’s
five-year litigation campaign.

While my Threat Level colleagues are toiling away exposing security and privacy breaches, I’ll be on
Justin.tvdiscussing the ins-and-outs of an RIAA lawsuit. The standard of proof required to find you liable for copyright infringement depends on which judge you’re in front of, and damages can be as high as $150,000 per copyrighted music track.

As a roadmap, we’ll use the
Jammie Thomas litigation– the nation’s only file sharing case to go to trial. We covered the Minnesota federal trial gavel to gavel last year and have a deep understanding of the legal machinations at the heart of peer-to-peer file sharing litigation.

The RIAA’s campaign has ensnared more than
30,000 people. Don’t become another number.

Sketch: Norman
Quebedeau

Watch live video from
wiredlive on Justin.tv


Original post by David Kravets

Recent Posts
Recent Comments
About Us

Free WordPress Themes by Pro Wordpress Themes. You can change the content of this section by editing the about.php file within this theme's folder.